ReviewAddiction & health2026
Psychoactive Substances: Analytical Strategies for the Identification of Designer Drugs in Forensic and Clinical Contexts.
Review in Addiction & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Designer drugs, or novel psychoactive substances (NPS), are synthetic analogues of controlled drugs engineered to mimic their pharmacological effects while evading legal regulation. Their rapid emergence and global distribution pose major challenges to public health, law enforcement, and analytical laboratories due to their unpredictable effects and complex chemical variability. Methods: This review compiled and analyzed recent literature on the classification, pharmacology, abuse patterns, and analytical detection of designer drugs. Key instrumental techniques such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were evaluated alongside novel sensor-based technologies. Relevant case studies were examined to highlight clinical and forensic implications. Findings: The major classes of designer drugs include synthetic cathinones, cannabinoids, benzodiazepines, phenidate derivatives, and dissociatives. Traditional analytical methods provide high sensitivity and selectivity but face challenges like matrix effects, derivatization needs, and limited on-site applicability. Emerging sensor technologies, including molecularly imprinted polymers and aptamer-based biosensors, offer rapid and portable alternatives for field testing. GC-MS and LC-MS/MS remain the gold standards for confirmatory testing, while innovative nano-enabled sensors show promise for real-time detection and point-of-care diagnostics. Conclusion: Continuous evolution of designer drugs necessitates adaptable analytical strategies. Integration of advanced sensor platforms with established chromatographic methods and strengthened inter-laboratory validation can enhance global surveillance and improve public health responses to NPS abuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.