Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898459›Full record

ArticleAddiction & health2026

Smartphone Addiction Among Zimbabwean Undergraduate Students: A Prevalence and Cross-Cultural Validation of the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV).

Sidney Muchemwa, Pamela Isabel Ayanda Moyo, Blessing Paradza, Omega Chipunza, Anotida Roselyn Hove, Beatrice Kudzaishe Shava, Dixon Chibanda, Jermaine Matewu Dambi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction & health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sidney MuchemwaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0121-5356
Pamela Isabel Ayanda MoyoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8337-5972
Blessing ParadzaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1479-0667
Omega ChipunzaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6695-0776
Anotida Roselyn HoveDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4050-0135
Beatrice Kudzaishe ShavaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9130-7010
Dixon ChibandaFriendship Bench Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2505-8607
Jermaine Matewu DambiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2446-7903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Smartphones are an invaluable daily tool, with 57% of the global population (4.6 billion people) having mobile access to the internet. However, excessive/problematic use of smartphones is highly prevalent globally. The use of smartphones, particularly among university students, offers many unique opportunities for learning, entrepreneurship, and social interaction. Despite these benefits, "excessive" or "compulsive" use of smartphones has emerged as a growing concern. Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV). We also assessed the prevalence of smartphone addiction and its factors among Zimbabwean university students (N=380). Data were analysed through factor analyses and binary logistic regression using SPSS and STATA at a 0.05 significance level. Findings: Participants' mean age was 21.90 (±1.90) years, and most participants were female (56.3%). The SAS-SV yielded a two-factor solution, with high reliability (α=0.84) and sufficient construct validity. The prevalence of smartphone addiction was 54.2%. Using social media [OR=2.7; 95% CI=(1.2-5.9)], using a smartphone for entertainment [OR=2.2; 95%CI=(1.2-4.0)], experiencing coronavirus-induced anxiety [OR=2.70; 95% CI=(1.2-5.9)], and encountering an adverse event [OR=1.8; 95% CI=(1.02 - 3.23)] were associated with an increased risk of smartphone addiction. Conversely, using smartphones for academic work was protective against smartphone addiction [OR=0.38; 95% CI=(0.19-0.77)]. Conclusion: Our study shows the SAS-SV is a brief and psychometrically robust outcome measure for routine clinical and research usage. Also, there is a high burden of smartphone addiction among university students from low-income countries and the need for bespoke interventions.

Indexed as

AddictionAnxietyDepressionPsychometricsRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID42898459
PMCPMC13678062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.