ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Multimodality salvage treatment incorporating ivonescimab plus chemotherapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastases after dose-escalated third-generation EGFR-TKI failure: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is among the most devastating modes of progression in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although dose escalation of third-generation EGFR-TKIs has been an important central nervous system (CNS)-directed salvage strategy, therapeutic options after progression on this intensification approach remain limited. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included consecutive patients treated between September 2024 and December 2025. Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed lung adenocarcinoma, a documented EGFR mutation, and LM diagnosed by gadolinium-enhanced MRI or positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. Patients received ivonescimab plus chemotherapy after documented intracranial or extracranial progression on a dose-escalated third-generation EGFR-TKI regimen used for LM management, with or without concurrent CSF-directed therapy. Ivonescimab was given intravenously at 20 mg/kg every 3 weeks with chemotherapy selected according to prior treatment and clinical status. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and LM progression-free survival (LM-PFS). Results: Of 517 screened patients, 33 initiated ivonescimab plus chemotherapy and comprised the overall treated cohort. Concurrent intrathecal or intraventricular chemotherapy was administered to 29 of 33 patients (87.9%). The median age was 61 years (IQR 56-62); 24 (72.7%) were female; 24 (72.7%) had baseline ECOG performance status of 2-3. The median number of prior therapy lines was 4 (IQR 3-6). At a median follow-up of 8.28 months, median OS was 8.54 months (95% CI 5.75-14.32), median LM-PFS was 6.54 months (95% CI 3.42-11.86), and median systemic PFS was 4.83 months (95% CI 2.79-7.56). Three-month treatment persistence was 64.4% (95% CI 44.9-78.6). Among 29 patients evaluable for LM response, 6 achieved a response, yielding an LM response rate of 20.7% (95% CI 8.0-39.7) and an LM disease control rate of 82.8% (95% CI 64.2-94.2). Among 31 patients with evaluable safety documentation, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14 (45.2%), most commonly hematologic toxicities. No permanent ivonescimab discontinuation due to toxicity was documented. Conclusions: This cohort provides real-world outcome data for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and LM receiving multimodality salvage treatment incorporating ivonescimab plus chemotherapy after dose-escalated third-generation EGFR-TKI failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.