ArticleJournal of cardiovascular and thoracic research2026
Investigating the Relationship Between Mitral Leaflet Separation Index and Severity of Mitral Valve Stenosis Using Two and Three-Dimensional Measurement Methods in Trans Esophageal Echocardiography.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiologists use several echocardiographic methods to evaluate the Mitral Stenosis (MS) severity. Determination of mitral valve area (MVA) by three- dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE) planimetry has the best correlation with anatomic area of the mitral orifice and is probably the reference method. This study was designed to examine the relationship between mitral leaflet separation index (MLSI) measured by TEE which is a simple and accessible method and MVA calculated by 3D Multiplanar reconstruction (3D-MPR) planimetry in TEE as the reference but less accessible method for evaluation the MLSI accuracy in prediction of the severity of MS. Methods: 72 patients with MS were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were suboptimal echocardiographic images, severe mitral valve calcification, artificial heart valves, a history of mitral valve repair surgery, or contraindications to TEE. After obtaining written informed consents from all patients. Comprehensive TTE and TEE were performed and MLSI by 2D TTE and 2D TEE and MVA by 3D MPR planimetry were assessed. SPSS version 25 was used for performing the analysis and a Results: The average age of the patients was 57.81±12.22 and of the patients were female. There was a significant correlation between MVA by 3D MPR and MLSI 2D TTE (r=0.94, Conclusion: MLSI 2D TTE and MLSI 2D TEE are positively correlated to MVA measured by 3D MPR planimetry and MLSI can be useful in discriminating different grades of MS severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.