SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2026
The cerebellum in migraine: a narrative review of anatomical, imaging, and clinical evidence.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migraine is usually framed through trigeminovascular pathways and interactions among the brainstem, hypothalamus, and cortex. The cerebellum has received less attention, although human studies place it within circuits that process trigeminal nociception and vestibular signals. This narrative review examines anatomical and experimental work together with imaging, genetic, and clinical studies, giving greatest weight to direct human migraine evidence. Repeated-measures imaging suggests that cerebellar connectivity changes across the migraine cycle, but the cohorts are small. Structural findings vary with analytic method, and population based testing does not show a general cerebellar deficit in common migraine. Evidence is more coherent in defined contexts: trigeminal stimulation recruits lobules VI/VIIIa and Crus I, vestibular migraine involves posterior cerebellar and wider vestibular-sensory networks, and treatment imaging shows cerebellar changes without localizing the site of CGRP-directed action. Findings in medication-overuse headache and familial hemiplegic migraine provide additional state-related and mechanistic clues. Taken together, the cerebellum is best viewed as a modulatory component of distributed migraine networks, with possible roles in sensory gain and vestibular integration. It is neither a demonstrated attack generator nor a validated treatment target. The next step is to test whether within-person cerebellar measures reproduce across attacks and whether intervention changes a prespecified circuit-level endpoint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.