Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898353›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Heterogeneous trajectories of oral frailty and their determinants in older patients receiving dental implants: a longitudinal study.

Ying Zhang, Nan Lu, Mengyao Liang, Qiufeng Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying ZhangDepartment of Prosthetics, Affiliated Nantong Stomatological Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Nan LuDepartment of Prosthetics, Affiliated Nantong Stomatological Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Mengyao LiangDepartment of Nursing, The Sixth People's Hospital of Nantong, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Qiufeng ZhuDepartment of Planting, Nantong Haoting Dental Clinic, Nantong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe distinct trajectory patterns of oral frailty after implant-supported prosthesis delivery in older patients and to identify associated factors. Methods: This prospective longitudinal cohort study consecutively enrolled 211 older patients who completed implant-supported prosthesis delivery at Nantong Stomatological Hospital and Haoting Dental Clinic between January 1 and April 30, 2025. Oral frailty was assessed using the adapted seven-item version of the Oral Frailty Index-8 (OFI-8, 7-item version; score range 0-9) at baseline (T0, prosthesis delivery) and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-delivery (T1-T4). Distinct trajectories were identified using latent class growth modeling (LCGM). Multivariable multinomial logistic regression was used to analyze factors associated with trajectory membership. Results: Three distinct oral frailty trajectories were identified: (1) Rapid Improvement-Stable Pattern (Class 1, Conclusion: Oral frailty trajectories in older patients with dental implants are heterogeneous. Older age, polypharmacy, and a greater number of missing teeth were independently associated with membership in the persistent high-risk trajectory, suggesting that these factors may help identify patients requiring prioritized follow-up.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedFrail ElderlyFrailtyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleOral HealthProspective StudiesRisk FactorsDental Implantsageddental implantationlatent class growth modelinglongitudinal studiesoral frailty

Identifiers

PMID42898353
PMCPMC13677534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.