ReviewBioImpacts : BI2026
Nano formulations of quercetin for ocular delivery.
Review in BioImpacts : BI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quercetin (QUE), a bioactive flavonoid with potent antioxidant, anti‑inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties, has emerged as a promising therapeutic candidate for age‑related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, cataracts, glaucoma, dry eye disease, and allergic conjunctivitis. Its therapeutic effects are primarily mediated through modulation of key molecular pathways, including direct scavenging of reactive oxygen species (ROS), activation of Nrf2‑dependent antioxidant responses, inhibition of NF‑κB and MAPK signaling, and downregulation of pro‑inflammatory cytokines and angiogenic mediators such as VEGF. However, effective ocular delivery of QUE remains challenging because anatomical and physiological barriers severely limit drug penetration and retention, and because QUE itself exhibits poor aqueous solubility, chemical instability, rapid clearance, and a narrow therapeutic window at the tissue level. Recent advances in nanotechnology‑based delivery systems including liposomes, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers, nanoemulsions, micelles, and polymeric nanoparticles have shown considerable potential to enhance corneal and scleral permeability, prolong ocular residence time, improve QUE stability and bioavailability, and enable more controlled local exposure. This review critically evaluates recent progress in QUE‑loaded nanocarriers for ocular drug delivery, integrating mechanistic insights, formulation strategies, and preclinical and emerging clinical data, and discusses key challenges and opportunities for the safe and effective clinical translation of quercetin‑based ocular nanotherapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.