ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Investigating risk factors and developing a predictive model for venous thromboembolism in patients with sepsis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with sepsis are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, existing assessment tools designed for general medical or surgical populations may inadequately capture the specific risk profile of septic patients. This study aimed to identify independent predictors of VTE in sepsis and develop a sepsis-specific prediction model. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients with sepsis diagnosed at a single center (2015-2024) were enrolled. Candidate predictors and treatments were restricted to data available within the first 24 h of diagnosis. After exclusions, 157 VTE cases and 703 matched non-VTE controls formed the prediction cohort, which was split into training ( Results: Among 3,228 sepsis patients, 157 (4.86%) developed VTE. Multivariable analysis identified four independent predictors: surgery within 3 months, central venous catheterization within 24 h, history of VTE ≥1 year prior, and absence of early anticoagulant therapy (all Conclusions: A sepsis-specific nomogram incorporating recent surgery, early catheterization, previous VTE, and absence of early anticoagulation demonstrated good discrimination and calibration. It outperformed the Padua and Caprini tools in internal validation. External validation is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.