ReviewiScience2026
Offshore wind farm impacts on marine fauna across taxa and ecological levels: A global review.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expansion of offshore wind farms (OWFs) is central to global decarbonization strategies, yet their effects on marine biodiversity are only partially understood. This systematic review synthesizes 221 publications up to June 2025 to assess the ecological impacts of OWFs on marine fauna living below the sea surface. The evidence base is uneven, heavily focused on North European waters, fish, and invertebrates, while expanding OWF regions and marine mammals remain underrepresented. Most studies examine short-term, individual-level responses, limiting inference on long-term effects. Impacts vary widely by stressor, taxon, and biological outcome. Invertebrates often show positive responses linked to reef effects, though key functional traits are vulnerable. Fish responses are largely neutral except under noise, while marine mammals exhibit the most consistent negative impacts. The impact score developed here highlights taxon-specific vulnerability and offers a scalable risk-assessment tool for data-poor regions. The review calls for standardized, long-term field monitoring to support OWF expansion while safeguarding biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.