Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898231›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2026

Image-Guided Decubitus Craniospinal Irradiation Setup in a Fixed-Beam Proton Room: Accuracy and Efficiency.

Qi Zeng, Zhiqiang Han, Arpit Chhabra, Huifang Zhai, Qing Chen, Andy Shim, Andrew Okhuereigbe, Anh Kha, Jewel Graham, Anya Burke and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Qi ZengNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Zhiqiang HanNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Arpit ChhabraNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Huifang ZhaiNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Qing ChenNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andy ShimNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrew OkhuereigbeNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Anh KhaNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jewel GrahamNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Anya BurkeNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Meng Wei HoNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Francis YuNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Yao YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Yoshiya YamadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Charles B SimoneNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Haibo LinNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
Dong HanNew York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Recent developments have further demonstrated the feasibility of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) delivery using simplified beam arrangements, such as a single posterior brain beam. Extending these advances, CSI delivered in the lateral decubitus position within a fixed-beam proton room offers an opportunity to improve room utilization and treatment access but introduces unique challenges in patient setup and image guidance. Methods: This study compares 2 image-guided setup workflows for decubitus CSI to evaluate whether meaningful differences exist. We retrospectively analyzed 10 CSI patients treated in the decubitus position between 2024 and 2025 using the fixed-beam ProBeam system with the 3-iso technique. Two setup workflows were evaluated: (1) Continuous Full-Field Image Guidance (CFF-IG), in which all isocenters were aligned prior to treatment delivery, and (2) Selective Field-Based Image Guidance (SF-IG), in which full-field imaging was applied only at the initial fraction, followed by field-specific verification thereafter. Setup accuracy was quantified using translational and rotational deviations derived from oblique kV imaging, and dosimetric robustness was assessed through target coverage and junction dose gradient analysis. Setup efficiency was evaluated using treatment room time stamps. Results: Across all 3 isocenters, mean translational deviations were below 4 mm and mean angular deviations were below 1.5°. Differences in target coverage (ΔD95) and junction dose gradients were small between the 2 workflows. No statistically significant differences in setup accuracy or dosimetric quality were observed. SF-IG was associated with shorter average setup time, with the majority of treatment sessions completed within 30 minutes. Conclusions: Both CFF-IG and SF-IG achieved setup accuracy within institutional action levels and maintained dosimetric robustness for CSI delivered in the decubitus position using pencil beam scanning. The absence of significant differences suggests that either approach may be clinically feasible for decubitus CSI delivery. SF-IG offers a more time-efficient workflow without compromising treatment quality, supporting its use as the preferred default strategy, while CFF-IG may be reserved for select cases requiring enhanced global realignment. These findings support decubitus CSI as a practical extension of modern single-beam and simplified pencil beam scanning CSI techniques.

Indexed as

CSIDecubitusProton therapy

Identifiers

PMID42898231
PMCPMC13677571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.