ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2026
Image-Guided Decubitus Craniospinal Irradiation Setup in a Fixed-Beam Proton Room: Accuracy and Efficiency.
Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Recent developments have further demonstrated the feasibility of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) delivery using simplified beam arrangements, such as a single posterior brain beam. Extending these advances, CSI delivered in the lateral decubitus position within a fixed-beam proton room offers an opportunity to improve room utilization and treatment access but introduces unique challenges in patient setup and image guidance. Methods: This study compares 2 image-guided setup workflows for decubitus CSI to evaluate whether meaningful differences exist. We retrospectively analyzed 10 CSI patients treated in the decubitus position between 2024 and 2025 using the fixed-beam ProBeam system with the 3-iso technique. Two setup workflows were evaluated: (1) Continuous Full-Field Image Guidance (CFF-IG), in which all isocenters were aligned prior to treatment delivery, and (2) Selective Field-Based Image Guidance (SF-IG), in which full-field imaging was applied only at the initial fraction, followed by field-specific verification thereafter. Setup accuracy was quantified using translational and rotational deviations derived from oblique kV imaging, and dosimetric robustness was assessed through target coverage and junction dose gradient analysis. Setup efficiency was evaluated using treatment room time stamps. Results: Across all 3 isocenters, mean translational deviations were below 4 mm and mean angular deviations were below 1.5°. Differences in target coverage (ΔD95) and junction dose gradients were small between the 2 workflows. No statistically significant differences in setup accuracy or dosimetric quality were observed. SF-IG was associated with shorter average setup time, with the majority of treatment sessions completed within 30 minutes. Conclusions: Both CFF-IG and SF-IG achieved setup accuracy within institutional action levels and maintained dosimetric robustness for CSI delivered in the decubitus position using pencil beam scanning. The absence of significant differences suggests that either approach may be clinically feasible for decubitus CSI delivery. SF-IG offers a more time-efficient workflow without compromising treatment quality, supporting its use as the preferred default strategy, while CFF-IG may be reserved for select cases requiring enhanced global realignment. These findings support decubitus CSI as a practical extension of modern single-beam and simplified pencil beam scanning CSI techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.