SynthesisFrontiers in big data2026
Big data analytics and sentiment analysis for health misinformation detection: a systematic literature review of influencing factors, implementation challenges and a data-driven adoption framework.
Synthesis in Frontiers in big data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to identify the factors influencing big data analytics (BDA) and sentiment analysis (SA) for health misinformation detection and associated challenges for the adoption of BDA and SA across health ecosystems. The systematic literature review (SLR) methodology was applied for addressing the study's objectives. Thirty most relevant seminal studies (peer-reviewed articles and conference proceedings) were retrieved from 11 digital platforms to conduct the SLR. Results of the study showed that advanced deep learning architectures, feature engineering, sentiment intelligence, real-time analytics, and human-centered verification were key factors that influenced big data analytics and sentiment analysis based health misinformation detection. It was also identified that annotation limitations, scalability constraints, domain adaptation challenges, ethical concerns, and sustainability challenges negatively impacted the adoption of big data and sentiment driven health misinformation detection systems. The study has developed a data-driven framework to effectively adopt and sustain big data analytics and sentiment analysis to detect health misinformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.