ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Nurses' perspectives on perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with lung cancer in the pre-implementation phase: a CFIR 2.0-guided study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite strong evidence supporting perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery, little is known about factors that may influence implementation prior to program rollout, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Guided by the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0), this study aimed to identify anticipated barriers and facilitators to inform program refinement and future implementation strategies. Methods: A descriptive qualitative design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nurses from the thoracic surgery department of a tertiary hospital in China (September-November 2025). Guided by the four CFIR 2.0 domains (innovation, outer setting, inner setting, individuals), directed content analysis was performed based on nurses' perspectives. Results: Sixteen nurses were interviewed, representing diverse roles: Ward/ICU frontline staff nurses, charge nurses, unit secretaries, administrative nurses and nurse managers. Relevant constructs included 22 of the 29 CFIR 2.0 constructs and 8 subconstructs. Facilitators spanned: innovation (source, evidence base, relative advantage, trialability); outer setting (financing, policy, external pressure); inner setting (relational connections, communication, culture, incentive systems); and individual factors (team needs, leadership/practitioner capability, motivation). Barriers comprised: innovation (adaptability, complexity, cost); outer setting (local condition, partnerships and connections); inner setting (structural characteristics, compatibility, access to knowledge and information); and individuals (recipient needs, capability). Notably, implementation concerns differed across nursing roles, reflecting role heterogeneity and underscoring the need for tailored implementation strategies. Conclusion: Implementation of perioperative PR for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery is influenced by multilevel factors spanning innovation, outer setting, inner setting, and individuals determinants. Differences in concerns across nursing roles highlight the importance of role-tailored implementation strategies. These findings provide a foundation for optimizing implementation approaches and may facilitate the sustainable integration of evidence-based PR into routine practice, particularly in resource-constrained healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.