ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
Neurology and headache medicine in Malawi: territory, education, and the path to strengthening primary care in sub-Saharan Africa.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) bears a disproportionate burden of neurological and pain-related diseases while facing a severe shortage of trained specialists. In this context, expanding neurology and, particularly, headache medicine, through education and integration within primary care represents both a necessity and an opportunity. This Perspective proposes a context-sensitive framework in which three interconnected domains-territory, culture, and capacity-shape the accessibility, acceptability, and sustainability of neurological care. Drawing on the experience of the International Headache Society (IHS)-DREAM healthcare network partnership in Malawi, we examine how locally adapted education, task-shifting and task-sharing can contribute to capacity building while highlighting the limitations of approaches that focus on training alone. We argue that closing the neurological treatment gap requires a shift from specialist-centred to system-centred neurology, integrating workforce development with primary care, culturally grounded community engagement, appropriate supervision and referral pathways, supportive national health policies, and equitable access to essential medicines. Task shifting and task sharing between physicians and non-physician clinicians may constitute a sustainable component of this model when appropriately regulated, supervised, remunerated, and integrated with specialist support and referral pathways. Rather than proposing a model for direct transfer across SSA, this Perspective advocates locally led, context-dependent implementation strategies capable of adapting to diverse health systems. Such an approach reframes global neurological capacity building from the episodic transfer of expertise towards the development of resilient and sustainable systems of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.