Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026
Sex-divergent trends in cardiorespiratory endurance after the COVID-19 pandemic: a 21-year interrupted time series analysis of Chinese university students.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Studies of COVID-19 and physical fitness in Chinese university students rarely extend beyond 2022, and none has formally tested whether post-pandemic trends differ by sex. Methods: Using 21 years of routinely collected fitness data (2005-2025), we examined indicator-specific change and sex differences in population-level trends in a repeated cross-sectional design. The cardiorespiratory analytic sample comprised 297,565 valid records from 91,686 full-time undergraduates at one comprehensive university in Zhejiang Province, China. Six indicators were classified by data availability and suitability for interrupted time series (ITS) analysis; cardiorespiratory endurance (1000-m run for men, 800-m for women) was pre-specified as the primary outcome and body weight was analysed within the same framework as a negative control. The unit of analysis was the annual grade-standardised mean, giving 18 time points per sex. Single-breakpoint models estimated the immediate level change at 2020 ( Results: Run times in 2020 rose above counterfactual projections in both sexes (women +9.60 s, 95% CI 2.58-16.62, Discussion: Cardiorespiratory endurance was the only indicator analysed by ITS that showed a sustained pandemic-associated change, and its subsequent trend diverged by sex. These are aggregate population trends rather than individual trajectories, but they suggest that post-pandemic aerobic programming may need to be sex-specific, and that continuity of aerobic activity deserves explicit attention in emergency preparedness planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.