ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
The value of cardiopulmonary ultrasound in diagnosing cardiogenic pulmonary edema in patients with heart failure.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Heart failure (HF) is generally complicated with cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE), the early diagnosis and treatment is essential. We aimed to evaluate the effects of cardiopulmonary ultrasound (CPUS) in the diagnosis of CPE in HF patients, to provide reference for the management of HF. Methods: HF patients entering The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region & Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences intensive care unit (ICU) between March 2025 and July 2026 were included. All patients underwent CPUS and chest computed tomography (CT), and comparison of the detection rates of cardiogenic pulmonary edema between CPUS and CT. Results: A total of 117 patients with HF were enrolled in this study. Of the 117 HF patients, 46 were diagnosed with CPE, and 43 were correctly diagnosed by CT, with a diagnostic accuracy of 94.9%, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 93.5%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 95.8%, the sensitivity was 93.5%, the specificity was 95.8%, the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 22, and the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.07. While 41 were correctly diagnosed by CPUS, with a diagnostic accuracy of 92.3%, the PPV was 91.1%, NPV was 93.1%, the sensitivity was 89.1%, the specificity was 94.3%, the PLR was 16, and the NLR was 0.12. Comparison of CT and CPUS in the diagnosis of CPE, there was no statistically significant difference between the two methods ( Conclusions: In conclusion, the present study suggests that CPUS is feasible for identifying cardiogenic pulmonary edema in ICU patients with heart failure. Based on diagnostic agreement analysis, CPUS demonstrates promising performance for CPE detection in this critically-ill cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.