ArticleBrain & spine2026
Phrenic nerve palsy: Cervical spine stenosis or Parsonage and Turner syndrome? A case series and review of the literature.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Phrenic nerve palsy is a rare cause of dyspnea. The differential diagnosis between cervical spine stenosis and Parsonage and Turner syndrome (PTS), the 2 main causesof phrenic nerve palsy, can be challenging. Research question: How to differentiate cervical spine osteoarthritis from PTS in front of a patient with phrenic nerve palsy? Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 8 patients suffering from phrenic nerve palsy. Clinical presentation, imaging, and electrophysiological data are analyzed. A literature review is conducted to support the diagnostic management. Results: The 8 patients, 5 men and 3 women, were 36 to 78 year-old. Six patients presented with acute or subacute onset of symptoms, and clinical as well as electrophysiological features were consistent with PTS. In 3 of them, Magnetic Resonance neurography demonstrated hourglass constrictions along the phrenic nerve. No surgery was performed, and they all had a favourable outcome following conservative treatment. In one patient, cervical foraminal stenosis was clearly implicated, with rapid improvement after decompressive surgery. In another case, cervical surgery was performed on severe C3C4 and C4C5 osteophytic changes with no significant clinical improvement; the rapid elevation of the hemidiaphragm over six weeks and the prior recurrent febrile/inflammatory episodes raise doubts in retrospect about the cervical compressive etiology. Discussion and conclusion: Phrenic nerve palsy results mostly from PTS or cervical spine stenosis, requiring distinct diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. A careful clinical, biological, electrophysiological and radiological assessment is essential to distinguish between these entities and provide timely and appropriate management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.