Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42898136›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Impact of traditional Chinese medicine combined with conventional therapies on the survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Jianfu Zhou, Shuyang Yang, Haoqiang Chen, Lei Hu, Yinglin Zhou, Hui Jiang, Jingmin Mai, Shu Gan, Zhiqiang Chen, Songtao Xiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jianfu Zhou *Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shuyang Yang *The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Haoqiang Chen *The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Lei HuThe Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yinglin ZhouThe Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Hui JiangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jingmin MaiThe Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shu GanDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Zhiqiang ChenDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Songtao XiangDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is incorporated into the long-term integrative management of advanced prostate cancer in China, but evidence linking treatment duration with survival remains limited. Because treatment duration accumulates during follow-up, classifying patients by their final recorded treatment duration can misallocate pre-threshold observation time and bias survival comparisons. Methods: We evaluated the association between cumulative continuous TCM treatment exceeding 6 months and all-cause mortality in a single-center retrospective cohort of 242 patients with metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma at diagnosis who received continuous TCM from diagnosis. Follow-up continued through May 1, 2024. Treatment exceeding 6 months was modeled as a time-dependent exposure in Multivariable Cox regression, with sensitivity analyses addressing an alternative threshold, disease-severity adjustment, influential observations, and loss to follow-up. Results: During follow-up, 147 deaths occurred. Median overall survival was 53.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.0-61.0), with 3- and 5-year survival rates of 64.0% and 43.4%, respectively. Cumulative continuous TCM treatment exceeding 6 months was associated with a lower average hazard of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.269; 95% CI, 0.186-0.389; P < 0.001). The association attenuated over time: adjusted HRs at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 0.098, 0.192, 0.286, and 0.471, respectively. Sensitivity analyses yielded estimates in the same direction. Conclusion: These findings define a duration-survival association among TCM users and support prospective, multicenter evaluation using detailed longitudinal treatment records.

Indexed as

Chinese TraditionalCohort StudiesMedicineNeoplasm MetastasisProportional Hazards ModelsProstatic NeoplasmsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID42898136
PMCPMC13677356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.