ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2027
Current role of boron neutron capture therapy in head and neck cancer: insights from 4 years of clinical experience.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBoron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) was approved in Japan in June 2020 as a curative option for unresectable, locally advanced, or recurrent head and neck cancers. Relevantly, its efficacy and safety in clinical practice should be regularly monitored, particularly regarding its optimal positioning. Therefore, to advance its clinical application, we assessed clinical data on BNCT for head and neck cancers.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 285 patients who received initial BNCT between June 2020 and May 2024 with available ≥1 month follow-up data. The primary endpoint was local control (LC); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment response, and grade ≥ 3 adverse events.
resultsThe 2-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 41.5%, 26.4%, and 59.2%, respectively. The complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and objective response (CR + PR) rates were 47.0%, 33.3%, and 80.4%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 3 late adverse events was 14.0% at 2 years, with grade 5 adverse events occurring in 2.1% of patients. No significant differences were observed in LC or PFS among histological type subgroups; however, OS was significantly worse in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) than in patients with non-SqCC. Regarding TNM stage at irradiation, radiation therapy at an early disease stage was significantly associated with improved LC.
conclusionsBNCT should be administered during the early disease stages when no other effective treatment options are available. Further studies should determine the factors contributing to treatment efficacy and safety, thereby optimizing multimodal treatment strategies involving BNCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.