ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2026
Real-World Patient Eligibility for Alzheimer's Disease Anti-Amyloid Therapy in Seven Swedish Memory Clinics.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnti-amyloid therapies lecanemab and donanemab are the first potentially disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) approved in Europe. We estimated real-world eligibility for these treatments in a large multicenter memory clinic patient cohort in Sweden (MemClin).
methodsMemClin included patients with a first diagnostic visit between 2016 and 2022 at seven specialist memory clinics in Stockholm, Sweden. To estimate eligibility for anti-amyloid therapy, we applied key inclusion/exclusion criteria from the lecanemab and donanemab appropriate use recommendations. Eligible patients were required to have (1) a clinical diagnosis of AD-type dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), (2) confirmed Aβ pathology (abnormal CSF Aβ42) and (3) no apparent medical exclusion criteria. Eligibility was calculated for different scenarios to provide both upper-bound estimates (main analysis) and more conservative, implementation-ready estimates of near-term treatable patients (sensitivity analysis).
resultsCohort consisted of 2126 patients (mean age 77.1 ± 6.6 years; 61.8% MCI, 24.2% dementia, 13.7% subjective cognitive impairment). In the main analysis, 11.5% of the whole cohort was estimated to be eligible for either treatment (lecanemab 10.6%, donanemab 11.5%). Most eligible patients had early-stage disease (61.9% MCI vs. 38.1% dementia) and an A + T- biomarker profile, that is, normal biomarker of tau (57.9%). Eligibility was markedly lower in sensitivity analyses (e.g., 2.7% when all patients without MRI were assumed ineligible).
conclusionsEven upper-bound estimates indicate that a minority of real-world memory clinic patients may currently qualify for anti-amyloid therapy. These findings provide timely evidence to inform the ongoing debate on the implementation of anti-amyloid therapy in public healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.