ArticleEpilepsia open2026
Early neurocognitive outcomes following SEEG with radiofrequency thermocoagulation.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early neurocognitive outcomes following SEEG with radiofrequency thermocoagulation.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCharacterization of early neuropsychological outcomes following SEEG with radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTHC) is essential to guide patient expectations around return to work, study, and caregiving. The current study aimed to describe the early neurocognitive sequelae of SEEG.
methodsConsecutive patients undergoing SEEG were prospectively recruited from two tertiary epilepsy centers in Melbourne, Australia. Patients were administered the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) via telehealth before and 3 weeks after SEEG (M = 19.69 days, SD = 4.41). Given the telehealth platform, the coding subtest was substituted for the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, and a modified score of global cognitive function was calculated. To evaluate group changes, paired sample t-tests were performed. Reliable change indices were computed to explore individual-level changes. Pearson's correlation coefficients evaluated relationships between change in global cognitive function and SEEG admission variables. SEEG patients were invited to complete a semi-structured interview canvassing the recovery following SEEG.
resultsTwenty-eight patients completed the neuropsychological examination (M = 37.89 years, SD = 9.72, range = 17-56 years, 54% female). All patients underwent RFTHC with a mean of 11.43 (SD = 6.87, range = 2-28) coagulation sites. At a whole group level, 3-weeks post SEEG there was no evidence for global nor domain-specific cognitive change. Reliable change indices with 90% confidence revealed only 4% (1/28) declined on at least two measures and 10% (3/28) showed psychometric improvement. Pearson's correlational coefficients showed no evidence for association between change in global cognitive function with SEEG factors including admission length, number of spontaneous or stimulated seizures, number of electrodes, or number of RFTHC sites. Subjective reports of language change tended to be accompanied by a decline on the RBANS language index that did not meet reliable change criteria. Most patients reported returning to work around 4 weeks post SEEG. SIGNIFICANCE: By 3 weeks, gross cognitive functioning tends to be in keeping with pre-SEEG performances for most patients. These findings have direct clinical implications for SEEG neuropsychological counseling. PLAIN LANGUAGE STATEMENT: SEEG is increasingly used to guide epilepsy surgery. Despite this, little is known about the cognitive recovery in the weeks following the procedure. We found that for most patients, broad cognitive functioning 3 weeks after SEEG with coagulation was consistent with function before SEEG, with only a small minority showing significant changes. Some people who reported language difficulties also showed a decline on language testing, although this was often small. Of those patients working before SEEG, most returned to work by 4 weeks. These results provide important evidence to guide patient counseling, recovery planning, and management after SEEG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.