ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Experiences and Coping Strategies of Emergency Department Nurses Regarding Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency nurses' unethical pro-organizational behaviors (UPBs) exert detrimental effects on individual well-being, professional performance, and clinical workplace atmosphere; nevertheless, qualitative evidence systematically exploring the underlying mechanisms and coping strategies of such behaviors in the Chinese nursing context remains scarce.
aimThis study aimed to qualitatively explore the sources, perceived impacts, and coping strategies of UPBs among emergency department nurses in China.
designDescriptive qualitative study.
methodsThis study was conducted in the emergency department nurses of five hospitals in China between February and March 2026. A total of 21 registered nurses aged ≥ 18 years who were currently in practice were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were collected using semistructured interviews until thematic saturation was achieved. Data analysis was performed using qualitative content analysis.
resultsThree main themes emerged-sources, impacts, and coping-highlighting that UPBs arose from high-pressure environments and distorted loyalty, led to moral distress and normalization, and was managed with adaptive and self-rationalizing strategies.
conclusionsUPBs among emergency nurses constitute a vicious cycle fueled by workplace stressors, implicit cues, and coping strategies, which profoundly affects individual well-being and organizational ethics. These findings suggest that source-oriented humanistic interventions, including environmental optimization, ethical support, competence enhancement, and cultural reshaping, are essential for practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nursing managers should target systemic and cultural drivers of UPBs, clarify ambiguous expectations, establish ethical support (e.g., confidential reporting and debriefings), model integrity-based leadership, and decouple loyalty from unethical compliance. These actions are designed to alleviate ethical distress, reduce rule-bending, and break the vicious cycle in emergency settings. REPORTING
methodThis study was reported in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.