Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42897811›Full record

ReviewGlia2026

Microglial Labeling in Mouse Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of Timing, Efficacy, and Specificity.

Ruth Colbert, Julia Di Stefano, Dearbhaile Dooley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Glia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruth ColbertSchool of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1766-7154
Julia Di StefanoSchool of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3825-9803
Dearbhaile DooleySchool of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5337-1831

Funding

Research Ireland 19/FFP/6642Research Ireland 22/FFP-P/11503Research Ireland GOIPG/2024/2465University College Dublin
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a complex and disabling condition with no curative therapy currently available. The mechanical damage of the primary injury phase is followed and exacerbated by a secondary injury phase, characterized by the release of free radicals and pro-inflammatory cytokines that lead to chronic inflammation. Microglia, as the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, play a critical role in orchestrating this inflammatory response. Studying their dynamics after SCI not only deepens our understanding of injury pathology but also advances the development of microglia-targeted immunotherapies. However, trauma-induced transcriptional and phenotypic changes mean that markers used to identify homeostatic microglia may be unreliable when applied to their reactive counterparts. Another major challenge lies within discriminating resident microglia from infiltrating monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), which permeate the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) after injury. In this review, we examine three key variables for selecting appropriate strategies for labeling microglia in mice: (i) time (in relation to injury); (ii) efficacy (within the chosen murine SCI model); and (iii) specificity (to microglia). We discuss the transcriptional landscape of murine microglia pre-injury and its alteration post-injury, evaluate the strengths and limitations of commonly used markers, and highlight emerging tools and approaches for studying microglia in preclinical murine SCI research.

Indexed as

MicrogliaSpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsBlood-Spinal Cord BarrierDisease Models, AnimalMiceantibody markersmicrogliamouseneuroinflammationreporter micespinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID42897811
PMCPMC13680788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.