Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42897753›Full record

ReviewJournal of mass spectrometry : JMS2026

From Innovation to Translation: Emerging Direct-Analysis Mass Spectrometry Platforms.

Thais Lino, Adriano Reis José da Silva, Davi Rodrigues da Silva, Welisson Vilarindo de Oliveira, Diego Gomes Rocha, Rodinei Augusti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thais LinoMackenzie Institute for Research in Graphene and Nanotechnologies (MackGraphe), School of Engineering, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7777-4819
Adriano Reis José da SilvaMackenzie Institute for Research in Graphene and Nanotechnologies (MackGraphe), School of Engineering, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0329-5687
Davi Rodrigues da SilvaMackenzie Institute for Research in Graphene and Nanotechnologies (MackGraphe), School of Engineering, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7586-4485
Welisson Vilarindo de OliveiraMackenzie Institute for Research in Graphene and Nanotechnologies (MackGraphe), School of Engineering, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2222-7861
Diego Gomes RochaDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6699-2474
Rodinei AugustiDepartment of Chemistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9448-9518

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ambient and direct-analysis mass spectrometry has shifted from predominantly proof-of-concept rapid screening to increasingly robust analytical platforms with clearer translational potential. This focused critical review examines the following four emerging or strategically relevant platforms: dielectric-barrier-discharge ionization (DBDI), liquid electron ionization (LEI), paper cone spray ionization (PCSI), and sandpaper spray ionization (SPS). DBDI, PCSI, and SPS are ambient or ambient-like direct-sampling approaches. LEI is included as a complementary direct-analysis platform because its electron-ionization chemistry provides structurally informative fragmentation and can address limitations of soft-ionization methods. The review emphasizes recent advances in source and substrate engineering, analytical reproducibility, quantitative readiness, portability, and application-driven implementation. The review uses representative evidence from the literature to distinguish demonstrated analytical performance from broader translational potential, while recognizing that reported detection limits and precision values depend on the method, matrix, and analyte. Rather than cataloging all ambient ionization methodologies, the article critically evaluates the mechanistic strengths, limitations, maturity, and realistic implementation prospects of the four selected platforms in forensic, environmental, pharmaceutical, and field-analytical contexts. Collectively, these technologies illustrate a broader maturation of direct-analysis mass spectrometry, and their long-term impact will increasingly depend on quantitative validation, reproducibility, workflow standardization, and integration with practical analytical needs.

Indexed as

ambient ionization mass spectrometrydielectric‐barrier‐discharge ionizationdirect‐analysis mass spectrometryliquid electron ionizationsubstrate‐based ionization

Identifiers

PMID42897753
PMCPMC13680635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.