ReviewJournal of mass spectrometry : JMS2026
From Innovation to Translation: Emerging Direct-Analysis Mass Spectrometry Platforms.
Review in Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ambient and direct-analysis mass spectrometry has shifted from predominantly proof-of-concept rapid screening to increasingly robust analytical platforms with clearer translational potential. This focused critical review examines the following four emerging or strategically relevant platforms: dielectric-barrier-discharge ionization (DBDI), liquid electron ionization (LEI), paper cone spray ionization (PCSI), and sandpaper spray ionization (SPS). DBDI, PCSI, and SPS are ambient or ambient-like direct-sampling approaches. LEI is included as a complementary direct-analysis platform because its electron-ionization chemistry provides structurally informative fragmentation and can address limitations of soft-ionization methods. The review emphasizes recent advances in source and substrate engineering, analytical reproducibility, quantitative readiness, portability, and application-driven implementation. The review uses representative evidence from the literature to distinguish demonstrated analytical performance from broader translational potential, while recognizing that reported detection limits and precision values depend on the method, matrix, and analyte. Rather than cataloging all ambient ionization methodologies, the article critically evaluates the mechanistic strengths, limitations, maturity, and realistic implementation prospects of the four selected platforms in forensic, environmental, pharmaceutical, and field-analytical contexts. Collectively, these technologies illustrate a broader maturation of direct-analysis mass spectrometry, and their long-term impact will increasingly depend on quantitative validation, reproducibility, workflow standardization, and integration with practical analytical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.