ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2026
Methods and Techniques for Closed-Loop Gastrointestinal Pacing.
Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeGastrointestinal slow waves are rhythmic electrical events that contribute to the coordination of motility. Functional motility disorders such as gastroparesis are linked to abnormal slow wave activity, and current treatments do not target the underlying electrical dysfunction. Gastrointestinal electrical pacing restores normal rhythms, but open-loop pacing lacks adaptation to underlying slow wave activity, leading to reduced energy efficiency and potential overstimulation.
methodsA novel closed-loop pacing system was developed to detect gastric and intestinal slow waves and dynamically pace in response to the underlying rhythm. High-resolution electrode arrays were placed on the serosal surface of anesthetized pigs for simultaneous pacing and mapping. The control strategy comprised two steps: (i) continuous detection and classification of slow waves as normal rhythm (stomach: 15-25 s; small intestine: 3-5 s) or abnormal rhythm; and (ii) pacing delivery and entrainment assessment, with pulses (100-400 ms, 3-8 mA) triggered by abnormal rhythms or failed entrainment.
resultsDetection of slow wave events achieved an accuracy of 78% for both the stomach and the small intestine. Entrainment detection yielded an accuracy of 73% for the stomach and 67% for the small intestine. Closed-loop pacing successfully restored abnormal gastric and small intestinal slow wave periods to normal physiological ranges and reduced the number of pulses delivered by 60% compared to open-loop pacing.
conclusionClosed-loop pacing significantly reduced pulse delivery, demonstrating the feasibility of a targeted, adaptive approach that may reduce pacing burden, although effects on motility and gastric emptying warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.