ArticleBMC psychology2026
Mapping mental health complexity in esports: an exploratory psychosocial network approach.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid rise in popularity of esports has brought increased attention to the unique mental health challenges faced by esports players, yet research in this area remains in its infancy. Early research suggests a substantial mental health burden and has examined associations between esports-specific stressors, mental health, and sleep disturbances. However, much of this work has relied on traditional methodologies, providing limited insight into how affective, psychosocial, sleep-related, and esports-specific indicators are organised within this competitive performance environment.
methodsTo address this gap, we developed a bespoke 17-item questionnaire tailored for Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) network analysis, an exploratory approach for mapping the conditional dependency structure of complex multivariate systems such as mental health.
resultsA total of 1025 esports players from over 60 countries completed the survey. Game-related thought preoccupation, a core feature of gaming disorder, emerged as the most robust structural sink node, downstream of several psychosocial indicators, raising the hypothesis that it represents a compound indicator of broader upstream psychosocial strain. Depressed mood occupied an upstream position within the network, an observation that held more robustly for the psychopathological subnetwork as a whole than for depressed mood as the single source. Mental fatigue occupied an intermediate, connecting position between affective variables and the sleep and fatigue indicators. Its high prevalence, together with a positioning upstream of the sleep indicators, suggests that it may warrant closer examination in future research on training load, recovery, and sleep in esports, though this ordering rested on edges with moderate directional support. Emotion control and a sense of autonomy appeared to connect upstream affective distress with downstream esports-specific indicators such as esports-related stress, though was the least stable of the structural features identified.
conclusionsCollectively, these findings provide an exploratory map of how mental health-relevant indicators were organised in this performance environment, and generate concrete, testable hypotheses for future longitudinal, experimental, and intervention research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.