ArticleBMC zoology2026
Migration dynamics of acoustic-tagged hatchery and natural atlantic salmon smolts.
Article in BMC zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the migration dynamics of two Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolt origin groups (hatchery, n = 374; natural, n = 231) in the Penobscot River Estuary and Bay, Maine, U.S.A., during the springs of 2010-2012. Smolts were acoustic-tagged and tracked for approximately 100 km to evaluate differences in movement rate, migration duration, path choice, and survival. While the behavioral differences between origin groups were not consistent, differences in survival were evident. Using a Cormack-Jolly-Seber mark-recapture model, we found that rearing origin and river discharge were the primary factors influencing smolt survival. Survival decreased with increasing river discharge across the observed range. Hatchery smolts (cumulative survival: 0.40-0.69) presented higher survival rates than their natural counterparts did (0.32-0.64), a finding that is inconsistent with much of the literature on hatchery versus river-reared fish. We hypothesize that the collection method for natural smolts at a dam bypass facility, which involves novel handling and dam interaction, may have contributed to their lower survival, potentially masking any inherent advantage over hatchery smolts. These findings underscore the importance of minimizing dam-related stressors and informing management actions aimed at improving the survival of outgoing smolt cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.