Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42897649›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026

3-D ordinal regression CNN for opportunistic breast density grading on chest CT.

Artur Wysoczanski, Elsa D Angelini, Sachin R Jambawalikar, Mary M Salvatore, Andrew F Laine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Artur WysoczanskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. aw3018@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2471-0827
Elsa D AngeliniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Sachin R JambawalikarDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mary M SalvatoreDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrew F LaineDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer has the highest incidence and second-highest mortality burden of all cancers in women. Breast density, the extent of fibroglandular tissue within the breast, is strongly associated with breast cancer risk, and is visually graded on a four-level ordinal scale on imaging studies including chest CT. However, current automated methods for CT breast density assessment are limited, relying on semi-automated breast segmentation followed by intensity thresholding, and excluding higher-order image features. In this work, we train and evaluate a 3-D convolutional neural net (3D-CNN) to predict breast density grade on CT.

methodsIRB-approved chart review identified female patients from 2010 to 19 with both mammography and chest CT acquired within 1 year. CT breast density was visually assessed following the BI-RADS density criteria by a subspecialist faculty radiologist. CT scans were downsampled to isotropic 2.5 mm resolution, and volumes of interest (VOIs) of size 80 × 80 × 80 voxels were extracted for each imaged breast. Our 3D-CNN model consists of consecutive 3-D convolutional layers with ReLU activation, convolutional block attention modules (CBAM), and batch normalization and pooling operations. Rank-consistent ordinal regression was applied to the final layer to predict the density grade of each VOI, with models optimized to minimize ordinal cross-entropy. Patient-level predictions were generated on test cases by averaging over the right- and left-breast VOIs.

results503 scans matched our inclusion criteria; 86 (17.1%) were assigned breast density grade 1 (i.e. mostly fatty), 244 (48.5%) were grade 2 (scattered dense), 131 (26.0%) were grade 3 (heterogeneously dense), and 42 (8.3%) were grade 4 (extremely dense). Our optimized 3D-CNN model achieved ROC AUC of 0.935, and Cohen kappa of 0.787, for classification of high (grades 3-4) versus low breast density, comparable to literature-reported inter-radiologist agreement. Both ordinal regression and attention mechanisms improved model performance over standard architectures. In test cases where both breasts were within the CT image, ROC AUC and Cohen kappa improved to 0.955 and 0.873, respectively.

conclusionsWe have developed a 3-D CNN model for prediction of breast density grade on chest CT which achieves test-set performance comparable to prior literature reports of inter-radiologist agreement on CT breast density.

Indexed as

Breast DensityImaging, Three-DimensionalRadiography, ThoracicTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID42897649
PMCPMC13679213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.