Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42897646›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2026

Ethnobotanical study on wild edible plants in The Kuancheng Traditional Chestnut Eco-Planting System, a globally important agricultural heritage system in Hebei, China.

Shuai Li, Qing Zhang, Yan Li, Xinxin Wu, Jingyong Wang, Chunlin Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuai LiKey Laboratory of Ecology and Environment in Minority Areas, Minzu University of China), National Ethnic Affairs Commission of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Qing ZhangKey Laboratory of Ecology and Environment in Minority Areas, Minzu University of China), National Ethnic Affairs Commission of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yan LiKey Laboratory of Ecology and Environment in Minority Areas, Minzu University of China), National Ethnic Affairs Commission of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Xinxin WuKey Laboratory of Ecology and Environment in Minority Areas, Minzu University of China), National Ethnic Affairs Commission of China, Beijing, 100081, China.
Jingyong WangAgricultural and Rural Bureau of Kuancheng Manchu Autonomous County, 067600, Hebei, China.
Chunlin LongKey Laboratory of Ecology and Environment in Minority Areas, Minzu University of China), National Ethnic Affairs Commission of China, Beijing, 100081, China. long.chunlin@muc.edu.cn.

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs 2025QT015National Natural Science Foundation of China 32370407 and W2523057National Social Science Foundation of China 25&ZD168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) are living agroecosystems shaped by the coevolution of traditional knowledge (TK) and agrobiodiversity. As a core GIAHS criterion, agrobiodiversity should be assessed beyond crops and livestock to include wild resources that communities regularly use and manage. Wild edible plants (WEPs) and associated TK that guide their identification, harvesting, processing, and habitat care are therefore a key but poorly documented part of agrobiodiversity in the mountainous regions of northern China. The Kuancheng Traditional Chestnut Eco-Planting System (KTCES) in Hebei Province, northern China, is a chestnut-based GIAHS with great diversity and value of WEPs. Along with the rapid economic development and fast reduction of TK, it is necessary to document WEPs and associated TK in KTCES, both to contribute to the conservation of agrobiodiversity and to provide a reference for the sustainable development of GIAHS.

methodsFrom February 2024 to July 2025, ethnobotanical surveys were conducted in six townships of Kuancheng Manchu Autonomous County, Hebei, China. The investigation methods include free listings, semi-structured interviews, key informant interviews and participatory observations. A total of 124 respondents were interviewed. Information was collected on the edible parts, categories, consumption methods, and multiple uses of WEPs. The cultural significance of these plants was assessed by calculating the relative frequency of citation (RFC) and the cultural food significance index (CFSI).

resultsA total of 87 species of WEPs belonging to 37 families and encompassing various categories, such as wild vegetables (67), wild fruits (16), spices (10) and nuts (3), were documented in this study. The primary parts utilized include tender leaves, fruits, roots, seeds, and flowers, with harvesting predominantly taking place in spring and summer. The most frequently used families were Asteraceae (20), Rosaceae (9), Fabaceae (6) and Amaranthaceae (5). On the basis of the CFSI and RFC values, 30 species were identified as the most significant in local dietary culture, including Gypsophila oldhamiana, Leptopus chinensis, Indigofera kirilowii and Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa and so on.

conclusionKTCES possesses abundant WEPs resources, and local residents possess a wealth of TK related to WEPs utilization. The diverse ways in which WEPs are used form the foundation for regional ecological adaptation and cultural identity. High-value WEPs have driven local economic development, ecological protection, and cultural innovation. It is necessary to investigate, document, and preserve WEPs and associated TK in GIAHS, as they hold particular significance for the conservation of agrobiodiversity and GIAHS.

Indexed as

AgricultureEthnobotanyPlants, EdibleBiodiversityChinaConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansKnowledgeAgrobiodiversityEthnobotanyGlobally Important Agricultural Heritage SystemsTraditional knowledgeWild edible plants

Identifiers

PMID42897646
PMCPMC13682038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.