ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2026
Efficacy and safety of mazdutide vs. dulaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of mazdutide vs. dulaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is closely linked to obesity and carries a high risk of metabolic complications. While GLP-1 receptor agonists like dulaglutide improve blood sugar and support modest weight loss, many patients do not reach their treatment goals. Mazdutide, a dual GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist, may offer stronger metabolic benefits.
objectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of mazdutide versus dulaglutide in adults with T2DM.
methodsWe systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing mazdutide and dulaglutide. Primary outcomes included changes in HbA1c, body weight, and achievement of glycemic and weight-loss targets. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events. Data were pooled using random-effects models, and evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE.
resultsThree trials met inclusion criteria. Mazdutide led to greater reductions in HbA1c (- 0.25%) and body weight (- 2.97 kg) compared with dulaglutide. Patients were more likely to achieve HbA1c < 7.0%, ≥ 5% weight loss, and the combined target of ≥ 5% weight loss with HbA1c < 7.0%. Fasting plasma glucose was numerically but not significantly improved. Mazdutide was associated with higher rates of gastrointestinal side effects and decreased appetite, with a non-significant numerical increase in hypoglycemia, while serious adverse events and discontinuations were similar between treatments. Glycemic and major weight outcomes were supported by high-certainty evidence; most safety outcomes were moderate-certainty.
conclusionsMazdutide, based on evidence from three RCTs, provides preliminary evidence of meaningful improvements in blood sugar control and weight loss compared with dulaglutide, though with an increased risk of mostly manageable gastrointestinal effects; given the limited number of trials, these findings should be considered preliminary and supporting its potential role as a promising dual-action therapy for T2DM management, pending confirmation in larger, longer-term trials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.