ArticleBMC oral health2026
Patient perspective regarding the role of social media, offline reputation, and practitioner characteristics in orthodontist selection: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeterminants of orthodontist selection in the modern era remain inconsistent, especially roles of online versus traditional factors. This study compared social media, offline reputation, and orthodontist characteristics associated with orthodontist selection.
methodsThis cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 330 working-age adults seeking orthodontic treatment (mean age 29.9 ± 3.3 years). Participants completed a validated three-part questionnaire: 1) demographic data and social media usage behavior; 2) factors associated with orthodontist selection, categorized into three domains: social media (e.g., credibility, online presence), offline reputation (e.g., awards, word-of-mouth), and orthodontist characteristics (e.g., caring, education, working age); and 3) the decision-making process of orthodontist selection, which served as the dependent variable. Responses in Parts 2 and 3 were rated on a five-point Likert scale. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was applied to identify significant factors (P < 0.05).
resultsInstagram, Facebook, and TikTok were the most frequently used platforms, with peak activity during night hours (20:01-00:00; 35.2%). Five variables were significantly associated with orthodontist selection. The strongest predictor was orthodontist's online presence (β = 0.200, P < 0.001), followed by perceived caring (β = 0.170, P = 0.004), word-of-mouth recommendations (β = 0.139, P = 0.007), educational background (β = 0.136, P = 0.016), and working age orthodontist (β = 0.130, P = 0.013). The model explained 21% of the variance.
conclusionsPatients perspective in orthodontist selection is related to a combination of these domains. While an online presence demonstrated the strongest correlation, offline reputation and orthodontist characteristics remain critical factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.