Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2026
Decision volume and temporal workload structure as dissociable correlates of fatigue and mood in intensive care physicians: a real-time observational study.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntensive care physicians make hundreds of decisions per shift under sustained cognitive and emotional demands. Decision fatigue, the tendency towards less effortful choices as cumulative decision load increases, may affect clinician wellbeing and decision processes. However, the associations of decision volume and temporal workload structure with within-shift fatigue and mood in intensive care unit (ICU) physicians remain unclear. This study explored whether decision volume and temporal clustering show distinct associations with fatigue, sleepiness, mood, and post-shift decision responses.
methodsFive physicians (two residents, three consultants) at a surgical ICU of a German university hospital were shadowed during 38 twelve-hour shifts (456 hours) between October and December 2025. Clinical decisions were classified by severity using a study-specific, non-validated Decision Severity Score. Because recruitment was feasibility-based and involved only five physicians, all analyses were considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Psychometric assessments of decision fatigue, sleepiness, and mood (Decision Fatigue Scale, Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, Profile of Mood States - Short Form) were administered at morning, midday, and shift end. Following each shift, physicians completed a standardised scenario task requiring three binary treatment decisions. Temporal workload structure was quantified using the burstiness metric; shifts were classified into four types by median split of decision density and burstiness (quiet-smooth, quiet-clustered, busy-smooth, busy-clustered). Linear and binomial mixed-effects models with physician as random intercept were used throughout.
resultsAcross 17,953 recorded decisions (median 474 per shift; range 366-589), a higher mean decision rate was associated with greater end-of-shift decision fatigue: an increase of 0.5 decisions per 5-minute interval corresponded to a 2.1-point higher decision-fatigue score (95 % CI 0.6 to 3.6). Higher burstiness was associated with less mood disturbance, with a 0.10 increase in burstiness corresponding to a 6.3-point lower mood score (95% CI -10.2 to -2.3). Averaged across all shifts, changes between morning and evening were small and not statistically significant for any of the three scores. Within-shift trajectories differed by shift type, however, with mood disturbance increasing over the shift in quiet-smooth shifts only, a difference already apparent at midday. Quiet-smooth shifts, the least objectively demanding, showed the least favourable psychometric values. Response certainty in the post-shift scenario task was lower after shifts with more task interruptions, with each ten additional interruptions corresponding to a 0.29-point lower certainty score (p = 0.012), whilst a descriptive trend towards more conservative scenario responses was observed in busy-clustered shifts (odds ratio 2.25, p = 0.555).
conclusionsDecision volume and temporal workload structure showed different associations with psychometric outcomes: higher decision rates were associated with greater end-of-shift decision fatigue, whereas greater temporal clustering was associated with lower mood disturbance, already apparent from midday onwards. That more quiet, uniformly paced shifts showed the least favourable psychometric values suggests that reducing decision volume alone may not improve physician wellbeing; this observation requires replication. Mitigation strategies may therefore need to extend beyond reducing decision volume to protecting concentrated, meaningful clinical activity and minimising hindrance stressors such as interruptions. Future multicentre studies should determine whether these associations are reproducible and whether temporal workload structure is related to objective decision quality or patient-safety outcomes.
trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00037564. Registered 27th August 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.