ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
A risk assessment model for gestational diabetes mellitus integrating maternal demographics and hematological indices in Thai women.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUniversal screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is the gold standard, but it can be difficult and expensive in resource-limited settings. Many current prediction models rely on specialized tests that are not available in primary care. This study aimed to create a cost-effective risk assessment model using common maternal demographic and blood test data to help identify GDM risk in Thai pregnant women.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study with 200 pregnant women (24-28 weeks of gestation) at a secondary care hospital in Southern Thailand. We analyzed routine antenatal data, including complete blood count and other lab results. A risk-scoring system was built using multivariate logistic regression. We then tested the model's performance using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the optimal cut-off point.
resultsSix independent predictors were found maternal age over 35 years, systolic blood pressure above 130 mmHg, glycosuria, hemoglobin at least 11 g/dL, platelets at least 260.50 × 10
conclusionThe new risk assessment model, which uses basic demographic and routine blood test data, offers a reliable and affordable way to screen for GDM. This method enables early risk identification and helps healthcare providers use resources more efficiently, potentially reducing unnecessary tests in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.