Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42897513›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Socioeconomic inequalities and the economic burden of dental caries: a longitudinal simulation analysis across forty countries.

Neeladri Verma, Gerard Dunleavy, Amanda Stucke, Shivangi Jain, Julia Maciel de Rodrigues, Joao Hofmeister, Moritz Kebschull, Iain Chapple, Nicola West, Nigel Pitts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Neeladri VermaEconomist Impact, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Gerard DunleavyEconomist Impact, London, UK. gerard.dunleavyhp@gmail.com.
Amanda StuckeEconomist Impact, London, UK.
Shivangi JainEconomist Impact, London, UK.
Julia Maciel de RodriguesEconomist Impact, São Paulo, Brazil.
Joao HofmeisterEconomist Impact, São Paulo, Brazil.
Moritz KebschullNIHR Biomedical Research Centre Birmingham, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Iain ChappleNIHR Biomedical Research Centre Birmingham, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nicola WestBristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nigel PittsFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2024, World Health Organization (WHO) member states endorsed the Bangkok declaration, prioritising oral diseases within universal health coverage and non-communicable disease agendas, and calling for prevention-oriented, primary care-led systems. This study aimed to: (1) explore the healthcare costs of managing dental caries between the ages of 12 and 65 years across income quintiles in 40 countries, and (2) estimate the potential reduction in direct costs from non-targeted and targeted oral health-promoting interventions.

methodsA cohort simulation model was developed to estimate the direct costs of dental caries over time for different income quintiles across 40 countries. National-level DMFT (dentine threshold) data, the relative likelihood of receiving an intervention (such as a restorative procedure, tooth extraction and replacement), and clinically guided assumptions were used to populate the model. Private treatment costs in each country were used as a proxy to estimate the direct costs of dental caries. A hypothetical group of upstream and downstream preventive interventions were applied either uniformly across all income groups to reduce caries progression rates by 30% or in a "levelling-up" fashion with the greatest gains seen in the lowest income group.

resultsThe population-level direct costs of caries from 12 to 65 years of age varied between US$317.8 million in Slovenia to US$182.6 billion in China. The highest per-person costs were in Switzerland at US$51,932 and the lowest in Jordan at US$6,339. The per-person direct costs were highest in the lowest income quintile 40 countries. Inadequate preventative oral care for lower income groups results in 50% higher total treatment costs. With the uniform application of preventive measures across all income quintiles, the greatest reduction in per-person costs for caries management was seen in the lowest income quintile across all countries. With a levelling-up approach, cost reductions in the lowest income group ranged from US$4,083 in Vietnam to US$43,106 in Switzerland.

conclusionLower income groups experience a greater health and economic burden from dental caries. Early, targeted preventive interventions, such as twice daily brushing with fluoridated toothpaste, water fluoridation, oral health education, and school programs, within a life-course, equity-driven framework, can reduce costs, mitigate disease burden, and advance global oral health equity.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessDental CariesHealth Care CostsAdolescentAdultAgedChildHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthYoung AdultDental cariesEconomic burdenInclusivityInequalitiesNon-communicable diseasesOral healthPreventionPublic healthSocioeconomic

Identifiers

PMID42897513
PMCPMC13681945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.