ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Candida auris in a tertiary intensive care unit: a four-year retrospective case series.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCandida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant yeast associated with healthcare-associated transmission and severe outcomes in intensive care settings. Clinical ICU-based cohort data from Türkiye remain limited.
methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective case series in a tertiary adult intensive care unit in Türkiye, including patients with C. auris isolated from blood and/or urine cultures between January 1, 2021, and January 1, 2025. Species identification was performed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) for selected isolates was conducted using the Sensititre™ YeastOne™ colorimetric microdilution system. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (minimum-maximum) according to distribution, whereas categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Comparative statistical analyses were not performed because of the descriptive case-series design and limited sample size.
resultsAmong 5,778 ICU patients evaluated during the study period, C. auris was identified in 36 patients. No cases were detected in 2021-2022; all cases occurred between September 18, 2023, and December 23, 2024, representing 2.37% of 1,517 ICU admissions during that interval. Isolation was most frequent in urine cultures (77.8%), followed by blood cultures (33.3%), with simultaneous urine and blood positivity in 11.1% of patients. The mean length of hospitalization before the first C. auris-positive culture was 44.9 days. All patients had urinary and central venous catheters and had received broad-spectrum antibiotics before C. auris detection. In the preceding month, MDR bacterial bloodstream infections were identified in 16 patients. AST data were available for four blood culture isolates from three patients; fluconazole MIC values were > 256 µg/mL in all tested isolates, whereas micafungin showed the lowest arithmetic mean MIC value (0.188 µg/mL).
conclusionsC. auris emerged in our ICU after 2023 and was mainly detected in patients with prolonged hospitalization, invasive devices, broad-spectrum antimicrobial exposure, and frequent MDR bacterial co-occurrence. These single-center data from Türkiye highlight the importance of reliable species-level identification, infection control awareness, and antimicrobial stewardship. Larger multicenter prospective studies using standardized surveillance and reference-method-based AST protocols are needed to better define transmission dynamics, resistance patterns, and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.