ArticleBMC nephrology2026
External evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models for tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: implications for model-informed precision dosing.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTacrolimus, a primary immunosuppressant in kidney transplantation, exhibits variable pharmacokinetics. While model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) using population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) models improve dosing accuracy, models developed in specific populations lack applicability in other populations. We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of published models integrated in clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in Indian adult renal transplant recipients.
methodsPredictive performance of four published PopPK models were evaluated using an independent dataset of 120 trough concentrations from 60 adult renal transplant recipients. Models were assessed using prediction based and simulation-based diagnostics. Maximum a posteriori (MAP) Bayesian prediction was also used to evaluate the model performance.
resultsA priori predictions (PRED) for all four models demonstrated systematic underprediction, with relative mean prediction error (rME) ranging from - 25.0% to -64.0%, failing clinical acceptability thresholds. However, integrating patient-specific data via MAP Bayesian estimation corrected this bias and improved precision. Notably, all models achieved higher accuracy and precision, with more than 60% of individual predictions falling within [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) of the observed values. Additionally, scaling down the clearance parameter by 30% mitigated the systematic bias observed in the initial a priori predictions.
conclusionsPublished PopPK models exhibited significant systematic bias when applied to Indian renal transplant recipients, posing a substantial risk of overdosing if used without adjustment for initial dose selection. However, these models adapted using MAP Bayesian approach or scaling of clearance parameter demonstrate better predictive performance in this cohort, suggesting they can guide proactive precision dosing in the Indian cohort. Prospective studies evaluating the target attainment and clinical outcomes are required to establish their clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.