ArticleBMC primary care2026
Physician perspectives on Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in primary care: a cross-sectional study in Israel.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) offers significant potential to enhance diagnostic certainty and therapeutic decision-making in primary care settings. Despite widespread conceptual endorsement and the introduction of training programs, real-world adoption remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate attitudes, clinical practice patterns, and barriers to integration among Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) who received formal POCUS training within a large Israeli healthcare organization.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among PCPs in one Healthcare Maintenance Organization in Israel who had previously completed POCUS training. Data were collected via an electronic questionnaire assessing specific modules used, device types, satisfaction levels, and perceived barriers. Respondents were categorized as active, former, or never users, and statistical analyses were performed to identify correlations among device type, usage, and satisfaction.
resultsOf 341 eligible PCPs, 126 completed the survey (37% response rate). The majority (88%) were active users. The most frequently utilized applications were lung (93%), abdominal (79%), and musculoskeletal (55%) assessments, with a specific focus on lung parenchyma and urinary pathologies. Active users reported high levels of diagnostic confidence (84%) and believed POCUS improved treatment (77%). The primary barriers cited were a lack of time (60%), a lack of experience (50%), a lack of confidence (39%), and insufficient compensation (32%).
conclusionsTrained PCPs perceive POCUS as a valuable tool that enhances diagnosis and treatment. However, barriers regarding time constraints, confidence, and experience persist despite formal training. Successful integration of POCUS in primary care requires addressing these workflow-specific challenges and selecting devices that align with the unique needs of ambulatory practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.