ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Hemodynamic and Geometrical Parameters Associated with Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Cross-Sectional Study Using 4D Flow MRI and CFD.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCarotid geometry and local hemodynamics are closely associated with atherosclerosis, yet how anatomy and disturbed flow jointly mark disease presence and relate to pro-atherogenic flow in still-non-stenosed bifurcations remains unresolved. This study quantifies the cross-sectional association between three-dimensional carotid bifurcation geometry and pro-atherogenic flow and identifies anatomical biomarkers for non-invasive risk stratification.
methodsGeometric analyses included 346 carotid bifurcations, comprising 240 stenosed and 106 non-stenosed bifurcations. Patient-specific CFD was performed in 176 bifurcations: 101 stenosed and 75 non-stenosed. Eight geometric descriptors, including a new offset flow divider capturing bifurcation apex asymmetry, and four ICA bulb hemodynamic indices (TAWSS, OSI, RRT, BFI) were extracted; logistic and linear regression assessed the association of geometry with (i) stenosis presence and (ii) pro-atherogenic flow.
resultsBifurcation angle, ICA angle, tortuosity, and offset flow divider were significantly elevated in stenosed bifurcations (all
conclusionsCarotid geometry carries two complementary signals: markers of disease presence (bifurcation angle, ICA angle) and candidate anatomical substrates of pro-atherogenic flow in still-non-stenosed bifurcations (bulb area, area ratio). Together with the post-stenotic expansion ratio, these geometric features define a compact, image-derivable set of candidate biomarkers for future early carotid risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42897431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.