ArticleThe AAPS journal2026
Predictive Performance of pyDarwin-Selected Versus Expert-Developed Paediatric Tobramycin Population Pharmacokinetic Models for Model-Informed Precision Dosing.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PyDarwin is an open-source Python package integrating machine learning with NONMEM for automated model selection; however, its utility in model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) remains unvalidated. This study aims to evaluate pyDarwin for population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) model development in MIPD compared with expert-developed models, using paediatric tobramycin as a representative case. The model-building dataset included 450 plasma concentrations from 63 children with cystic fibrosis (CF). One group manually developed a model using stepwise covariate selection, while another applied pyDarwin within a predefined 27-dimensional model space, using a fitness function that incorporated a penalty based on 24-h area under the curve (AUC
Indexed as
Identifiers
42897405What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.