ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Impact of
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate whether dose escalation of
conclusionIn this retrospective cohort, escalation from 12 to 18 mCi/kg was associated with faster neutrophil engraftment and a higher rate of normal MIBG scans at 1 year, without a significant difference in OS or EFS. The study was underpowered, and did not demonstrate a significant benefit of either the lower or the higher dose; the optimal dose remains undetermined and requires prospective evaluation. WHAT IS KNOWN: • WHAT IS NEW: • In this direct retrospective comparison (12 vs. 18 mCi/kg), the higher dose was associated with faster neutrophil engraftment and a higher platelet engraftment rate and a higher rate of normal MIBG scans at year, but without a significant difference in OS or EFS, and with a non-significant trend toward more renal and thyroid toxicity. The study was underpowered and did not demonstrate a significant benefit of either dose; the optimal MIBG dose remains undetermined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42897384What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.