ArticleHormones (Athens, Greece)2026
Machine learning and penalized logistic regression-based models for the identification of potential characteristic genes in primary hyperparathyroidism.
Article in Hormones (Athens, Greece), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePrimary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is an endocrine disorder in which one or more parathyroid glands oversecrete parathyroid hormone, leading to hypercalcemia and potential complications such as kidney stones, bone fractures, and other systemic issues. Machine learning (ML) is extensively applied to diagnose medical diseases due to its high accuracy and ease of implementation.
methodsThe microarray expression dataset (GSE83421) was selected from the Gene Expression Omnibus Database (GEO) for analysis. Differential expression analysis was performed with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified correlated gene modules. Consensus feature selection using six algorithms (LASSO, SVM-RFE, random forest, Boruta, XGBoost, and decision tree) was applied to identify robust biomarkers and mitigate overfitting. A penalized logistic regression model was developed and evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV).
resultsTen candidate genes were identified by intersecting 24 DEGs with the WGCNA red module. Consensus ML selected five hub genes (LOC51092, KIAA1479, PRO2214, TBX4, and ZNF361). T. The LOOCV-validated penalized logistic regression model effectively distinguished PHPT from normal controls.
conclusionOur analysis identified a 5-gene signature (LOC51092, KIAA1479, PRO2214, TBX4, and ZNF361) with diagnostic potential for PHPT. The model was internally validated using LOOCV. However, without nested feature selection or external validation, the reported performance likely represents an optimistic estimate. Given the limited sample size, these findings represent preliminary hypotheses for PHPT diagnosis, requiring validation in independent cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42897365What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.