Trial reportArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Impact of intrapartum ultrasound on mode of delivery guidance and adverse pregnancy outcomes in primigravidae undergoing vaginal trial labor.
Trial report in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to analyze the impact of intrapartum ultrasound on mode of delivery guidance and the occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in primigravidae undergoing a vaginal trial of labor.
methodsA total of 200 primigravidae admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were included as the subjects of this study. They were randomly divided into a control group and a study group, with 100 cases in each group. The control group underwent the vaginal finger test, while the study group underwent a combination of the vaginal finger test and intrapartum ultrasound. The consistency between the vaginal finger test and intrapartum ultrasound in determining fetal position was evaluated in the study group, and the mode of delivery and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe consistency of fetal occiput position between ultrasound and vaginal finger examination in the study group was 54.5% for occiput anterior position, 46.1% for occiput posterior position, and 31.4% for occiput transverse position, with an overall consistency of 46.5%. There was no significant difference in the cesarean section rate between the two groups. The rate of vaginal delivery in the control group was significantly lower than that in the study group, while the rate of perineal laceration was significantly higher in the control group. There were no significant differences in adverse outcomes for mothers and newborns between the two groups. The Angle of Progression (AOP) during natural vaginal delivery was significantly higher than that in other delivery modes, while AOP in cesarean section was significantly lower than that in other delivery modes. The head-perineum distance (HPD) during natural vaginal delivery was significantly lower than that in other delivery modes, while HPD in cesarean section was significantly higher than that in other delivery modes.
conclusionIntrapartum ultrasound serves as an important adjunct in a vaginal trial of labor for primigravidae, aiding healthcare providers in accurately determining fetal head position, reducing the rate of perineal laceration, and increasing the rate of vaginal delivery. Notably, there are significant differences in ultrasound findings between women undergoing natural vaginal delivery and those with other delivery modes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.