ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026
Rare prostate cancer histologies: detection, characteristics and treatment.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Relatively rare histologies of prostate cancer collectively account for <5% of all prostate cancers and comprise mucinous adenocarcinoma, intraductal carcinoma, ductal adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine prostate cancer (including treatment-emergent small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma), sarcomatoid carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma. These histologies have distinct morphological, molecular and clinical features from each other and the most common histological type, acinar adenocarcinoma. The perceived rarity of these histologies often reflects sampling limitations rather than biological prevalence, as many treatment-emergent phenotypes are seldom encountered in routine practice owing to the infrequent use of metastatic biopsies. These histologies demonstrate aggressive behaviour, atypical metastatic patterns and reduced responsiveness to conventional therapies. Despite their clinical importance, these entities remain under-represented in standard guidelines and clinical trials. Histological types and subtypes, such as ductal, mucinous, intraductal, neuroendocrine and sarcomatoid carcinomas, pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, and conventional screening with PSA exhibits limitations, so they are often diagnosed at advanced stages. Multiparametric MRI, immunohistochemistry and genomic profiling are crucial tools for accurate recognition and risk stratification. Histological type-specific genomic alterations, including DNA repair deficiencies, RB1 and TP53 loss, and mismatch repair mutations, provide potential therapeutic opportunities, but treatment recommendations are still largely extrapolated from acinar adenocarcinoma. Limited retrospective data suggest worse outcomes for patients with a rare histology than those with typical acinar adenocarcinoma, highlighting the urgent need for prospective registries and dedicated clinical trials. Rare histologies of prostate cancer are an under-recognized source of morbidity and mortality. Improved diagnostic precision, incorporation of molecular profiling and collaborative data collection efforts are essential to develop evidence-based strategies.
Identifiers
42897296What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.