ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Applications of lung ultrasound in preterm infants: implications for respiratory distress syndrome and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a promising bedside imaging modality in neonatal intensive care units, offering real-time assessment of lung aeration without exposure to ionizing radiation. These advantages are particularly relevant for preterm infants, who are vulnerable to cumulative radiation exposure and evolving pulmonary disease. In this narrative review, we synthesize current evidence on the functional clinical applications of lung ultrasound in preterm infants. We focus on how LUS has been studied to guide early respiratory management, predict the need for surfactant and escalation of respiratory support, assess extubation readiness, identify infants at increased risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and monitor disease trajectory and response to therapy throughout the NICU course, including emerging data on longer-term respiratory outcomes. While available studies demonstrate promising diagnostic and prognostic value, interpretation is limited by heterogeneity in acquisition protocols, scoring systems, timing of assessment, and operator dependence. Further multicenter studies with standardized protocols are needed to define the role of LUS in routine neonatal respiratory care.
Identifiers
42897226What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.