ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Impact of fire extinguishing agents on DNA quantity and integrity.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In routine forensic genetics, samples from crime scenes after use of a fire extinguisher are often examined. These are usually vehicle or house fires in which the fire extinguisher was used to fight the fire. The vehicles include cars that have been stolen or used for criminal activities, or both, and then set on fire to destroy evidence. In addition, there are vehicles that have been involved in hit-and-run accidents and caught fire. Furthermore, fire extinguishers are sometimes used without a fire in order to deliberately destroy evidence at the scene of the crime. Either way, it can lead to an unsuccessful STR analysis and prevent the identification of the individuals involved. To investigate the hypothesis that the use of fire extinguisher or the chemicals they contain could be responsible for the failure, three different fire extinguishers were selected (powder, foam, and CO2 extinguishers), which are commonly used to extinguish small fires. Various surfaces were selected, including a laboratory table and typical vehicle surfaces. We created 620 artificial samples of blood, saliva, and epithelial cells on these surfaces, allowed them to dry, and then sprayed them with one type of extinguisher each. As a control, one cohort was not sprayed and used as reference. In summary, the use of the various extinguishers after a short incubation period (one hour) had no effect on DNA concentration and in STR analysis. However, with increasing incubation time (25 h) prior to sampling, the foam extinguisher cohort showed a reduction in DNA concentration, but there was no reduction of complete STR profiles for blood and saliva in any of the cohorts. Only the quality/completeness of the STR profiles based on epithelial cells decreased in the powder and foam extinguisher cohorts. The proportion of full profiles fell by 6% and 15% respectively, and the proportion of no evidence profiles rose by 17% and 13% respectively. However, the study did not reflect the impact of a real-world fire scenario. It could be assumed that completely charred surfaces or areas exposed to intense heat would yield poorer results in subsequent DNA analysis. Similarly, longer incubation times of fire extinguisher chemicals can have a greater impact and thus lead to a more reduction in the number of successfully typed samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42897220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.