Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42897196›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

ReScale4DL: balancing pixel and contextual information for enhanced bioimage segmentation.

Mariana G Ferreira, Bruno M Saraiva, António D Brito, Mariana G Pinho, Ricardo Henriques, Estibaliz Gómez-de-Mariscal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mariana G FerreiraAI-driven Optical Biology Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2886-4612
Bruno M SaraivaAI-driven Optical Biology Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9151-5477
António D BritoAI-driven Optical Biology Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1769-2627
Mariana G PinhoBacterial Cell Biology Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7132-8842
Ricardo HenriquesAI-driven Optical Biology Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal. r.henriques@itqb.unl.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-5234
Estibaliz Gómez-de-MariscalAI-driven Optical Biology Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal. esti.gomezdemariscal@unl.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2082-3277

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101001332"la Caixa" Foundation (Caixa Foundation) HR25-00453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning is the state-of-the-art approach for bioimage segmentation. However, it presents a paradox regarding image resolution: counterintuitively, deep learning segmentation performance can improve with lower image resolutions. This phenomenon is particularly significant in microscopy, where high-resolution acquisitions come with substantial costs in throughput, storage requirements and potential photodamage. We systematically evaluate how image resolution impacts segmentation by training popular architectures on datasets downsampled to 6-50% of their original resolution, mimicking lower-magnification acquisitions. Compared with models trained on native-resolution images, segmentation accuracy either improves (by up to 25% of mean Intersection over Union (IoU)) or degrades minimally (< 5% of mean IoU) when using images downsampled by up to fourfold (25% of the original resolution). Downsampling proportionally increases information throughput while reducing storage requirements and inference time. These findings provide practical guidelines for creating efficient, sustainable and cost-effective bioimaging pipelines that reduce data and computing needs while optimising microscopy techniques.

Identifiers

PMID42897196
PMCPMC13680607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.