ArticleSleep health2026
Considering counterfactual prediction models in sleep research: A demonstration of incident stroke prediction in an observational cohort study.
Article in Sleep health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveData-driven risk prediction algorithms are increasingly common. However, studies suggesting that a single set of variables are most "important" within a given risk prediction model ignore the reality that other equally useful models containing entirely different features may exist. We aim to use a novel approach (Model Path Selection) to demonstrate that, for any given health outcome, there are likely many comparable counterfactual models including different sets of variables. We focus on incident stroke as a scientifically meaningful outcome to motivate this demonstration.
methodsModel Path Selection uses an iterative model-building procedure to illustrate a set of counterfactual prediction models ("paths"). We applied Model Path Selection to Sleep Heart Health Study data (N = 4,512 adults) to predict 5-year incident stroke, considering 30 features comprising demographics, self-reported and measured medical risk factors, polysomnography, and self-reported sleep. Area Under the Curve was estimated for each resulting path based on 10-fold cross-validation.
resultsModel Path Selection identified 61 unique counterfactual models. 13 of these achieved Area Under the Curves between 0.81 and 0.82. Area Under the Curves of the remaining models ranged from 0.53 to 0.68 (median 0.61). All 13 top models included age plus various combinations of other features (polysomnography indices, body mass index, and/or the Short Form 36 mental and physical component scores).
conclusionsModel Path Selection can illuminate counterfactual prediction models, differentiate features that may be uniquely predictive from those that can be swapped out with other features, enhance reproducibility, inform the design of clinically practical predictive tools, and suggest sleep-related risk factors to be targeted for health promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.