Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42897000›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026

[Effectiveness comparison of one-hole split endoscopy and unilateral biportal endoscopy discectomy via the superior articular process approach for L

Xuedong Li, Ning Sun, Zhaozhong Sun, Sa Li, Genzheng Qi

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xuedong LiDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Shandong Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Binzhou Shandong, 256603, P. R. China.
Ning SunDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Shandong Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Binzhou Shandong, 256603, P. R. China.
Zhaozhong SunDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Shandong Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Binzhou Shandong, 256603, P. R. China.
Sa LiDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Shandong Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Binzhou Shandong, 256603, P. R. China.
Genzheng QiDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Shandong Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Binzhou Shandong, 256603, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness between one-hole split endoscopy(OSE) and unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) discectomy via the superior articular process approach for L Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 98 patients with L Results: All patients successfully underwent operation. The OSE group had significantly shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and smaller incision length than the UBE group ( Conclusion: Both OSE and UBE approaches for lumbar discectomy via the superior articular process can achieve satisfactory effectiveness for treating L

Indexed as

DiskectomyEndoscopyIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeAdultFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomefar lateral lumbar disc herniationminimally invasive techniqueOne-hole split endoscopysuperior articular processunilateral biportal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID42897000
PMCPMC13677525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.