ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Comparative study on effectiveness of two fixation methods in treatment of mid-column plantar-flexion Lisfranc injuries].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of open reduction with screw internal fixation versus primary arthrodesis for mid-column plantar-flexion Lisfranc injuries. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 45 patients (45 feet) with mid-column plantar-flexion Lisfranc injuries, who met the selective criteria between June 2019 and June 2022. Among them, 23 patients were treated with primary tarsometatarsal arthrodesis (arthrodesis group), and 22 patients received open reduction with screw internal fixation (screw group). There was no significant difference between groups ( Results: All patients underwent successful operation. The arthrodesis group had significantly longer operation time, longer incision length, more intraoperative fluoroscopy exposures, and greater intraoperative blood loss compared with the screw group ( Conclusion: For mid-column plantar-flexion Lisfranc injuries, primary tarsometatarsal arthrodesis yields better functional recovery and pain relief compared with open reduction and screw internal fixation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.