Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42896986›Full record

ReviewZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026

[Maximum limb reconstruction: concept and implementation strategies].

Yueliang Zhu

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yueliang ZhuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou Zhejiang, 310009, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thanks to the rapid development of modern science and medicine, limb reconstruction can and should be taken to the next level. The author proposes the concept of "maximum limb reconstruction", which pursues not merely function but the maximal normalization of structure, morphology, and function, leveraging advances in prosthetics, artificial intelligence, and exoskeleton technology to enhance limb preservation. For the three pathological states-defect, infection, and deformity-sequential strategies are outlined: ① mutilating injuries are managed in three phases (early revascularization, mid-term wound coverage and infection control, late length restoration and functional reconstruction); ② osteomyelitis treatment must prioritize radical debridement over reconstructive techniques; ③ severe deformities require active limb salvage treatment, long-term follow-up, and recognition of natural remodeling potential. Ultimately, limb reconstruction surgeons should integrate modern technology with holistic patient needs-physical, psychological, and sexual-to continuously improve outcomes, recognizing that the native limb, however imperfect, holds irreplaceable value for human identity and well-being.

Indexed as

Limb SalvagePlastic Surgery ProceduresArtificial LimbsDebridementHumansIlizarov TechniqueOsteomyelitisSurgical FlapsIlizarov techniqueslimb reconstructionLimb salvagemaximumosseointegrated prostheses

Identifiers

PMID42896986
PMCPMC13677490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.