ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2026
[Variant Allele Frequency Stratification and EGFR Co-mutation Characteristics in AKT1 E17K-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAKT serine/threonine kinase 1 (AKT1) E17K, the most common activating mutation of AKT1, is an established druggable driver in breast cancer; however, it is exceedingly rare in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with its clinical significance remaining unclear. Variant allele frequency (VAF) may partially reflect the clonal proportion of a mutation, offering clues to the clonal characteristics of such rare mutations. This study investigated the relationship between AKT1 E17K VAF and co-mutation with classic driver genes such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in NSCLC, aiming to explore the potential role of this mutation in tumor clonal evolution.
methodsNext-generation sequencing (NGS) data of lung cancer patients at Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University from June 2019 to April 2026 were retrospectively analyzed. After deduplication of 13,003 tests, 11,368 unique patients (including small cell lung cancer) were identified, among whom 35 harbored AKT1 E17K mutations (overall detection rate 0.31%), all being NSCLC; 5 external consultation cases were excluded, leaving 30 cases for analysis. Continuous VAF analysis was designated as the primary analysis, with an exploratory cutoff of 10%.
resultsOf the 30 patients, 20 (66.7%) were adenocarcinoma. Median follow-up was 12 months (range: 1-55 months). The EGFR co-mutation rate was lower in the high-VAF group (≥10%, n=17) than in the low-VAF group (<10%, n=13; 11.8% vs 46.2%), reaching nominal significance before correction [P=0.049, odds ratio (OR)=0.156] but not after Bonferroni adjustment (adjusted P=0.246). The median VAF was lower in the EGFR co-mutated group than in the EGFR wild-type group (1.37% vs 13.73%, P=0.071). Continuous analysis showed a negative trend between VAF and EGFR co-mutation (ρ=-0.340, P=0.066). After adjusting for histological type using Firth-corrected Logistic regression, the direction of the association remained unchanged but was no longer nominally significant (OR=0.21, 95%CI: 0.03-1.33, P=0.097).
conclusionsAKT1 E17K VAF showed a negative trend with EGFR co-mutation; however, the association did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons or adjustment for histological type, and may be partly influenced by histological composition. These findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger multi-center cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.